Legal Opinion

Angel v. McClean

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

Mr. and Mrs. McClean instituted separate suits against Mrs. Angel to recover damages for injuries received in an automobile collision. The two cases were consolidated and heard together. The jury found in favor of Mrs. McClean in the sum of $1500, but against Mr. McClean, and the latter did not appeal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment in favor of Mrs. McClean, and the petition of Mrs. Angel for writ of certiorari has heretofore been granted and argument heard. It seems to be conceded that the suit of Mr. McClean was dismissed because his negligence contributed to Mrs. McClean’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gochee v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Kelly v. HanwickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Terry v. SmylieMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Challinor v. AxtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cole v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Monroe County Motor Co. v. Tennessee Odin Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  3. Pearson v. ErbNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Snyder v. Missouri Pac. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Southern Railway Company v. ButtsTennessee Supreme Court · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API