Legal Opinion

Jaskiewicz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1994PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

James Jaskiewicz (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed in part and amended a referee’s grant of James D. Morrisey, Inc.’s (Employer) review and termination petitions for Claimant’s work-related injury. We affirm.

Claimant suffered a work-related injury and Employer accepted liability and issued a notice of compensation payable. Thereafter, Employer filed a review petition alleging Claimant’s medical treatment as neither reasonable nor necessary, but this review petition was withdrawn without prejudice, as the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Volkswagen of America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Winkelmann v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. McFaddin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Abbott v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Thao to v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Jordan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Palmer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API