McFaddin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BARRY, Senior Judge.
Patricia McFaddin appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (the Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision to terminate disability benefits. McFaddin argues that substantial evidence does not support the referee’s decision because the Board erred when it determined that the expert testimony offered by the defendant employer, Monongahela Valley Hospital (MVH) was unequivocal. Alternatively, McFaddin argues that accepting that expert’s testimony as unequivocal, it is not sufficient to meet MVH’s burden when seeking a termination of benefits. Finally,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Grabish v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Monaci v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Callahan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Bloom v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Jaskiewicz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Jenkins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Moltzen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.