Legal Opinion
Heath v. Mosley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 26, 1974No. 21PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
The sole question presented is whether, for impeachment purposes and as substantive evidence bearing on the fair market value of the boat immediately before the accident, defendants are entitled to show the amount plaintiff paid for his boat.
The measure of damages for injury to personal property is the difference between its fair market value immediately before and immediately after the injury. Roberts v. Freight Carriers, 273 N.C. 600, 160 S.E. 2d 712 (1968) ; Givens v. Sellars, 273 N.C. 44, 159 S.E. 2d 530 (1968) ; Simrel v. Meeler, 238 N.C. 668, 78 S.E. 766 (1953) ;…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Givens v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Roberts v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. CogginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. P. & F. Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnnie A. Canady Nancy Canady v. Crestar Mortgage Corporation, Johnnie A. Canady Nancy Canady v. Crestar Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Indiana Tri-City Plaza Bowl, Inc. v. Estate of GlueckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Zarn, Inc. v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Weener Plastics, Inc. v. HNH PACKAGING, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.