Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. P. & F. Motor Express, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 7, 1942PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScheNck, J.
The sole exception appearing in the record is to the court’s excluding certain testimony relative to the measure of damage. -The following appears:
“L. G-. Kelly, witness for the plaintiff, testified:
“I am foreman of the repair shop of City Chevrolet Company. I examined the automobile owned by United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company which was damaged in an accident on November 16, 1940, and made an estimate of the cost of repairing that car. The left rear door was bent, left rear quarter panel was bent, the left lower cowl was -bent, the left door lock pillar was bent, the front door was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baldwin v. MittryIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
- Kiely v. RagaliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- DeLaney v. Henderson-Gilmer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Farrall v. Universal Garage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Delaney v. . Henderson-Gilmer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Marion F. McDonald v. C. Y. Patton, Sr., Trading and Doing Business as Patton's Gulf ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Givens v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Roberts v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Averett v. ShircliffSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- Kinchen v. HansbroughLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.