Legal Opinion

Walker v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1926No. 24,779PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 208 N.W. 3, 7. Action by a surviving partner for an accounting. In 1892 plaintiff and Healy C. Akeley organized the firm of Walker Akeley for the purpose of buying and selling timber and timber lands. It continued until 1912, when it was dissolved by the death of Mr. Akeley. Its remaining assets included a large acreage of timber land, most of which had been cut over and some sold under executory contracts. Plaintiff, as surviving partner, has had charge of the firm's business since the death of Mr. Akeley. Claiming that the firm was indebted to him in a large amount, plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wheaton Roller-Mill Co. v. John T. Noye Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Church v. OdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. McAlpine v. MillenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Shevlin v. ShevlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Milwaukee Gold Storage Co. v. DexterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lehman v. StoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. H. F. Shepherdson Co. v. Central Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Dayton Co. v. Carpet, Linoleum & Resilient Floor Decorators' UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Bailey v. BaileyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Las Vegas MacHine & Engineering Works, Inc. v. RoemischNevada Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API