State v. Lowry
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOGGETT, Justice.
We consider whether the Attorney General of Texas must produce certain documents pertaining to an investigation conducted pursuant to the Texas Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act. The trial court ordered production of materials obtained through presuit civil investigative demands (CIDs) and of relevant documents in the custody of subdivisions of the Attorney General’s Office not directly involved in the underlying enforcement action and further required identification of the authors of related citizen complaint letters. We conditionally grant the writ of mandamus as to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Axelson, Inc. v. McIlhanyTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Peeples v. Honorable Fourth Supreme Judicial DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Loftin v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- GTE Communications Systems Corp. v. TannerTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Crosstex Energy Services, L.P. v. Pro Plus, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
- Ford Motor Co. v. CastilloTexas Supreme Court · 2009
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.