Legal Opinion

Crosstex Energy Services, L.P. v. Pro Plus, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2014No. 12-0251PublishedCited by 240 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

This interlocutory appeal arises out of property damage that resulted from an explosion at a natural gas compression station. The station owner, Crosstex Energy Services, L.P., sued the lead construction contractor, Pro Plus, Inc. The parties then entered a Rule 11 agreement to move expert designation dates beyond the limitations period. After limitations ran, Pro Plus moved to dismiss because Crosstex had not filed a certificate of merit with its original petition as required by section 150.002 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 150.002. In a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Texas a & M University System v. KoseogluTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by240 opinions

  1. Cadena Comercial USA Corp. D/B/A Oxxo v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. in Re Memorial Hermann Hospital System Memorial Hermann Physician Network Michael MacRis, M.D. Michael MacRis, M.D., P.A. And Keith AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Abutahoun v. Dow Chemical Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Sneed v. WebreTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In re Christus Santa Rosa Health SystemTexas Supreme Court · 2016

235 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API