Crosstex Energy Services, L.P. v. Pro Plus, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green
This interlocutory appeal arises out of property damage that resulted from an explosion at a natural gas compression station. The station owner, Crosstex Energy Services, L.P., sued the lead construction contractor, Pro Plus, Inc. The parties then entered a Rule 11 agreement to move expert designation dates beyond the limitations period. After limitations ran, Pro Plus moved to dismiss because Crosstex had not filed a certificate of merit with its original petition as required by section 150.002 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 150.002. In a…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Texas a & M University System v. KoseogluTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by240 opinions
- Cadena Comercial USA Corp. D/B/A Oxxo v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- in Re Memorial Hermann Hospital System Memorial Hermann Physician Network Michael MacRis, M.D. Michael MacRis, M.D., P.A. And Keith AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Abutahoun v. Dow Chemical Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
- Sneed v. WebreTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- In re Christus Santa Rosa Health SystemTexas Supreme Court · 2016
235 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.