Legal Opinion

Cox v. Odell

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1905No. 12PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. J. S. Noyes, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The record discloses an attempt at appeal from the judgment, but inasmuch as the same was not perfected until after the lapse of one year from the rendition of judgment, the same is ineffectual and must be dismissed. Entertaining the views hereafter expressed, we mav disregard the motion to dismiss the appeal from the order

The only points in the record in this case here presented are that the evidence is not sufficient to justify the findings, and that errors of law warranting reversal of the order occurred at the trial.

As to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sabine & E. T. R'y Co. v. JoachimiTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Rudel v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Ogburn v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. People v. WynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Beaulieu Vineyard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Cummings v. Columbia Pictures Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Williams v. Pacific Coast Aggregates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API