People v. Wynn
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses. He appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. In a long and studious brief his counsel assails the sufficiency of the indictment under which conviction was had, urging that the demurrer to the indictment should have been sustained and his motion in arrest of judgment granted. But, after careful consideration of the points that he makes, we are satisfied that the ruling of the trial court was correct. -The indictment charges an offense in language sufficient…
2Cited by11 opinions
- People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Spear v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- People v. RomoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.