Hampton v. Rose
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the grounds, (1) that the questions on which the decision of the court depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument (sec. 3, rule V, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal); and, that appellant has accepted and benefited by the fruits of the order.
The record discloses that a receiver was regularly appointed after a hearing on an order to show cause. The only documents in the record that were before the trial court at the hearing are the complaint and an affidavit of appellant. The complaint alleges that on June 20,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Moore v. ObergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- In re WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1931
- Neider v. DardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hampton v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hampton v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935