Legal Opinion

In re Williams

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 9, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANT, District Judge.

Some time prior to May 1,1930, the bankrupt, Chas. E. Williams, purchased from Minneapolis-Molino Power Implement Company, respondent herein, certain farm machinery- and farm implements on so-called conditional sales contracts. These contracts were not filed for record in any public office.

On May 22, 1930, said bankrupt executed and delivered to said respondent a chattel mortgage covering certain of the property included in said conditional sales contracts.

On May 23, 1930, tho bankrupt, by bill of sale, transferred to Grahek Hardware Company a considerable amount of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Murphy v. John Hofman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. May v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re SwoffordDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1952
  2. McClendon v. DeanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Irving Trust Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  4. Blanchette v. State of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  5. Pransky Sewing Machine Corp. v. Shawmut Bank of Boston, N.A.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API