In re Williams
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
CANT, District Judge.
Some time prior to May 1,1930, the bankrupt, Chas. E. Williams, purchased from Minneapolis-Molino Power Implement Company, respondent herein, certain farm machinery- and farm implements on so-called conditional sales contracts. These contracts were not filed for record in any public office.
On May 22, 1930, said bankrupt executed and delivered to said respondent a chattel mortgage covering certain of the property included in said conditional sales contracts.
On May 23, 1930, tho bankrupt, by bill of sale, transferred to Grahek Hardware Company a considerable amount of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Murphy v. John Hofman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- May v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re SwoffordDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1952
- McClendon v. DeanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Irving Trust Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Blanchette v. State of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Pransky Sewing Machine Corp. v. Shawmut Bank of Boston, N.A.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.