Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Rose

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1935No. Civ. No. 1549Published

1Opinion of the Court

HARDEN, J., pro tem.

This is an action to dissolve a partnership and for an accounting. (See Hampton v. Bose, 3 Cal. App. (2d) 167 [39 Pac. (2d) 447], wherein an appeal from an order appointing a receiver was dissolved, and Hamptons. Bose, 3 Cal. App. (2d) 170 [39 Pac. (2d) 449], wherein a motion to dismiss an appeal from the judgment was denied, *448for a statement of some of the facts.) The business was that of manufacturing and selling candy in Los Angeles.

Upon ample evidence the court found the existence of a partnership between plaintiff and defendant J. B. Rose. It is admitted that plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hampton v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Hampton v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API