Legal Opinion

Berkeley Hillside Properties Co. v. Kelly

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1926No. Docket No. 5155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

This action was brought under the provisions of section 349 of the Civil Code to collect by personal judgment the amount of a stock assessment.

The complaint alleges that the certificate was made out in the name of A. S. Kelly, and was fully paid for, though never delivered to him; that Kelly died and after his death the stock came into the hands of his executor; that Elizabeth P. Kelly was the sole devisee and legatee of the estate of A. S. Kelly and upon distribution thereof the executor of the estate delivered to her and she signed a receipt for all the property so distributed, including…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Probert v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. People's Home Sav. Bank v. StadtmullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Visalia & Tulare Railroad v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Welch v. GillelenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Geary St., Park & Ocean R.R. v. Bradbury Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeMello v. Dairyman's Cooperative CreameryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Prudential Petroleum Co. v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Security State Bank v. O'ConnorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API