Legal Opinion

Welch v. Gillelen

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1905No. L.A. No. 1394PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This action is brought by a creditor of the Ivanpah Smelting Company, a California corporation, to recover from the defendant his proportionate liability as a stockholder of said corporation under section 322 of the Civil Code.

Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant, and from said judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial plaintiff appeals.

The evidence shows that Blasdel and Sisson purchased certain stock of the Ivanpah Smelting Company, and to make payment therefor borrowed from defendant, the president of the Broadway Bank and Trust Company of Los Angeles, moneys…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baines v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Spreckels v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Glenn v. . GarthNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. O'Connor v. WitherbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Mudgett v. HorrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Schlitz v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Shattuck & Desmond Warehouse Co. v. GillelenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Hughes Manufacturing & Lumber Co. v. WilcoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Mitchell v. Banking CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API