People ex rel. Probert v. Robinson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
—This action was brought to oust the defendants from the offices of trustees of the St. Lawrence Mining Company, and to procure a judgment to the effect that the relators are entitled to said offices. The defendants claim to have been elected at a regular election held on the ninth day of January, 1880, the day on which it is conceded an election of trustees might properly be held. But the relators claim that the election is invalid because a majority of the capital stock of said corporation was not represented at said election.
It appears that one Bennett, who appeared by the books of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commercial Bank v. KortrightCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Grymes v. . HoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- New York & New Haven Railroad v. SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- State ex rel. White v. FerrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
- State ex rel. Guerrero v. PettineliNevada Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Morrill v. Little Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- In re the Election of Directors of the Argus Printing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- In re Canal Constuction Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1936
- State ex rel. Reed v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.