Frion v. Coren
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.
It is appellant’s position that respondents are liable under the safe-place statute, sec. 101.06, for failing to construct the railing of the balcony as free from danger as the nature of the building would reasonably permit. The trial court held that while the building is a public building within the meaning of the statute, only such portions thereof as are used in common by the tenants or the public are subject to the statute, citing Gobar v. Val. Blatz Brewing Co. (1923), 179 Wis. 256, 259, 191 N. W. 509, where it was held:
“Such part of an entire structure as is put to a public use is not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Holcomb v. SzymczykWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Gobar v. Val. Blatz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Bewley v. KippWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Skrzypczak v. KonieczkaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by9 opinions
- Antwaun A. Ex Rel. Muwonge v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Barry v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Lealiou v. QuatsoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Raymaker v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- Barthel v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.