Laubscher v. Branthoover

1

We note that the Ohio Supreme Court has recognized that, under certain circumstances, a failure to object or proffer in response to the granting of a motion in limine does not constitute a waiver of its challenge. See, Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc. (1985), 19 Ohio St. 3d 83, 86 n.5.

CHRISTLEY, P.J.,

Appellant, B & B Excavating Co., Inc., appeals from the trial court's judgment awarding appellee, Ralph Laubscher, ten percent of the company's profits on a sewer project pursuant to an oral employment contract and prejudgment interest.

Appellee was contacted in May 1986 by appellant's agent,…