Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Costello

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 6, 2006No. 54830-1-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

fl

Dwyer, J.

— An offender sentenced to a term of confinement has both a constitutional and a statutory right to receive credit for all confinement time served before sentencing. However, an offender serving multiple consecutive sentences is not entitled to have credit for a discrete period of confinement applied to each consecutive sentence, as this would result in a multiple award of the credit. Petitioner Tony Costello filed this personal restraint petition challenging the Department of Corrections’ (DOC) refusal to apply credit to each of two consecutive sentences for time he served in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Personal Restraint of CashawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. SpeaksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Matter of Personal Restraint of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re the Personal Restraint of PhelanWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of DutcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re CostelloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Stephens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API