Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Dutcher

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 30, 2002No. 49968-8-IPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

The legislature has provided that an inmate may earn early release credits and become eligible for early release into community custody, and that eligibility for community custody depends upon the merits of the offender’s release plan. The fact that the Department of Corrections (DOC) has decided to refer the offender for a civil commitment hearing does not change the department’s obligation, under the statute, to consider the inmate’s plan for community custody. The DOC thus had no authority to adopt a policy preventing William Dutcher from submitting a release plan and preventing its staff…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of Personal Restraint of CashawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re MinesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of MinesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of CrowderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Carver v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. In Re Personal Restraint of MattsonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of MattsonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of LiptrapCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. In re the Detention of KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API