Legal Opinion
Young v. Merle & Heaney Manufacturing Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 1915No. 22,972PublishedCited by 4 opinions
From Pike Circuit Court; John L. Bretz, Judge. Action by The Merle & Heaney Manufacturing Company against Lillian M. Young and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant named appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)
1Opinion of the CourtErwin, J.
Appellee brought this action against appellant, her sister, Lizzie, and E. H. Caulfield on a bond executed by Lizzie and Caulfield; and to set aside a conveyance of certain real estate made by Lizzie to appellant which bond is as follows:
“Know all men by these presents, That I, E. H. Caulfield, under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Louisiana, and having its principal office at New Orleans, La., as principal and L. Young, of New Orleans, La., as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Merle & Heaney Manufacturing Company, a corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Furst & Bradley Manufacturing Co. v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Ward v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Gaff v. SimsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Ashford v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1847
- Milroy v. QuinnIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bowyer v. Clark Equipment Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hawkins v. Meyer-Kiser Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1927
- Jordan v. Lynch Land Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- Palmer v. SchrageMichigan Supreme Court · 1932