Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Meyer-Kiser Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1927No. 13,051PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Action by appellee to recover against appellants upon a written contract, which was in the form of a bond and which is made a part of the complaint. The only question that the court is called upon to consider in deciding this appeal is the correctness of the ruling of the court below in sustaining appellee’s demurrer to appellants’ second paragraph of answer. If this ruling be correct, the cause should be affirmed; if incorrect, then it should be reversed. If the contract sued upon be a contract of suretyship, the ruling of the court upon appellee’s demurrer to the second paragraph of answer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Furst & Bradley Manufacturing Co. v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Young v. Merle & Heaney Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowyer v. Clark Equipment Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API