Legal Opinion · Dissent

Palmer v. Schrage

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 174, Calendar No. 35,842Published

1Dissent

On October 27, 1924, Constance G. Needham as vendor contracted to sell a lot in the city of Detroit to Harry F. Swogger and Myrtle B. Swogger, his wife, for the sum of $8,500, of which $1,000 was then paid, and the balance payable in monthly payments of $65, with interest at 6 per cent. if not in default, in which case the rate should be 7 per cent. On November 22d following, the vendor assigned her interest in this contract to Joseph A. Schrage and Elsie Schrage, his wife, the defendants herein. In part payment of the purchase price of a house and lot purchased from the plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Taussig v. ReidIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Bedford v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Furst & Bradley Manufacturing Co. v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Roberts v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Cahuzac & Co. v. SaminiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API