Milroy v. Quinn
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.
The amended complaint of the appellees,| against the appellant, states the following facts:
That the plaintiffs were partners in business, under the name and style of Quinn & Klinger, and were dealers in tobacco and cigars. Having doubts as to the solvency of Cornelius Conover, who lived in Indiana, the said plaintiffs being residents of Ohio, and Conover having applied to them for a sale of goods, they refused to make him any advance without a guaranty; whereupon the defendant made and delivered to the plaintiff his writing, as follows:
“ Delphi, Ind., Jan. 14, ’74.
“ Gents : Allow me to say to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Adams, Cunningham & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Reynolds v. DouglassSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Central Savings Bank v. ShineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- Craft v. IshamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
- Edmondston v. Drake & MitchelSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wills v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Frank Herman & Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Bowyer v. Clark Equipment Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kline v. RaymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Hasselman v. Japanese Development Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.