Outdoor World v. Continental Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Chief Judge.
On July 14, 1975, the plaintiff/appellant, Outdoor World, filed suit against the defendant/appellee, Continental Casualty Company, seeking a declaratory judgment regarding its right to indemnification for the expense of defending itself in a suit brought by a customer for breach of warranty. The parties submitted the case to the court on stipulated facts, and the court granted judgment in favor of Continental.
One issue is raised on appeal: is an insured entitled to indemnification for costs of defending a lawsuit for injuries occurring after the expiration of a general…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Federal Insurance Company v. PAT Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Insurance of North America v. Sam Harris Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Maples v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Scott v. KeeverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Keystone Automated Equipment Co. v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Lennar Corp. v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Millers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Ed Bailey, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- University Mechanical Contractors of Arizona, Inc. v. Puritan InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.