Legal Opinion

In Re Keith G.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 26, 1992No. 60 September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

The question presented is whether dismissal of a juvenile delinquency petition is an appropriate sanction where the intake officer’s preliminary inquiry exceeded, without a court order, the time requirement prescribed by Maryland Code (1984, 1991 Cum.Supp.), § 3-810 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article. That section, a part of the Juvenile Causes Act, provides in pertinent part:

“(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the intake officer shall receive:(1) Complaints from a person or agency having knowledge of facts which may cause a person to be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Harford County v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. In Re James S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Anthony R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Motor Vehicle Administration v. LytleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. In re D.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Kramer v. Liberty Property TrustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API