Legal Opinion

In Re James S.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 29, 1980No. [No. 107, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

We shall here affirm the determination of a trial judge that the word “shall” as used in Maryland Code (1974,1979 Cum. Supp.) § 3-812 (b), Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, is mandatory. The section in question, a part of Subtitle 8 entitled “Juvenile Causes,” is concerned with provisions for filing a petition. Section 3-812 states in pertinent part:(a) A petition shall allege that a child is either delinquent, or in need of assistance, or in need of supervision. If it alleges delinquency, it shall set forth in clear and simple language the alleged facts which constitute the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Police Commissioner v. DowlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Harbor Island Marina v. BOARD OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF CALVERT CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Resetar v. State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Lansdowne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. In Re Anthony R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Engineering Management Services, Inc. v. Maryland State Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Prince George's County v. VieiraCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Brodak v. BrodakCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API