Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Bryan

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1988No. 18259, 18326PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Zenoff, Sr. J.:

These are separate appeals from an order of the district court denying appellant’s petition for a writ of mandamus (Docket No. 18259), and a decision of the Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline removing appellant from his judicial office for willful misconduct and habitual intemperance (Docket No. 18326). Appellant has moved to disqualify Justice Young and Justice Steffen from sitting in review of the merits of these appeals. On October 4, 1988, this court entered an order consolidating these matters for the sole purpose of resolving appellant’s motions.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. COM. Ex Rel. CARROLL v. TATESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Kirksey v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Rivero v. RiveroNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Matter of DunleavyNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Halverson v. HardcastleNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Ainsworth v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1989

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API