State v. Nall
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
While the record on this appeal reveals that there are twenty-nine assignments of error based upon a like number of exceptions taken in the course of the trial, and to portions of the charge given by the court to the jury in the Superior Court, defendant, appellant, in his brief states only four questions as being involved.
The first question challenges the correctness of the rulings of the court in denying defendant’s motions aptly made for judgment as of nonsuit, pursuant to provisions of G.S. 15-173.
It is appropriate to note that the statute, G.S. 15-173, provides, in pertinent part, that,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Rice v. City of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. . BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. SearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Smith v. BranscomeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Smith v. Winn-Dixie Charlotte, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. AventSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. StrattonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.