State v. Stratton
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
Defendant Hal M. Stratton appeals his conviction as an accomplice to operating under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Supp.1989), following a jury trial in the Superior Court (Ken-nebec County, Alexander, J.). In this case of first impression for Maine, we hold that there was no error in the court’s instructing the jury on accomplice liability for OUI. Concluding also that the evidence amply supported the jury in finding defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt as an accomplice to that crime, we affirm.
After work on January 24, 1990,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- State v. AllisonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. MowerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Joiner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
- State v. StormsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HurdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- State v. MilletteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- State of Maine v. Todd J. PerkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- State of Maine v. Jody B. FlynnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.