Legal Opinion

State v. . Blankenship

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1948PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNbokne, J.

The question presented by defendant, and most earnestly argued, as involved on this appeal challenges the rulings of the trial court in declining to sustain his motions for judgment as of nonsuit on each of the charges preferred against him. After a careful consideration of the evidence in the case in the light of pertinent statutes, G.S. 20-138, G.S. 20-179, G.S. 20-140, and G.S. 20-141, and decisions of this Court, we are of opinion and hold that the evidence is sufficient to take the case to the jury, and to support a verdict of guilty on each of the offenses of which defendant stands…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. State v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. . LowerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Alston v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. United States v. Dennis Lloyd PardeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  3. State v. BeckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. State v. HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Brafford v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API