Legal Opinion

State v. Sears

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1952No. 652PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'WiNBORNE, J.

While appellant, the defendant, makes six assignments of error, only three need be given express consideration.

First: It is contended and argued by appellant that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment as of nonsuit made at the close of all the evidence, G.S. 15-173, as rewritten in Chap. 1086 of 1951 Session laws of North Carolina.

Such a motion made under the provisions of G.S. 15-173, formerly C.S. 4643, and as so rewritten, serves, and is intended to serve, the same purpose in criminal prosecutions as is accomplished by G.S. 1-183, as rewritten in Chapter…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. . FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. State v. . VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. . SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. . WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. NaborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API