Legal Opinion
De Novellis v. Shalala
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 22, 1996No. C.A. 96-11655PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GERTNER, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM RE: STAY PENDING APPEAL
I. BACKGROUND
Three related cases have been consolidated and are now before me. 1 All three involve long-time, management-level employees of the Administration for Children and Families (“ACF”), a division of the federal government’s Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”): Vincent De Novellis, Paul Kelley, and Laurentina Janey-Burrell.
The plaintiffs are all employees in the protected age group: Janey-Burrell is fifty-eight years old, Paul Kelley is sixty, and Vincent De Novellis, sixty-eight. Each is facing imminent, adverse…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dana Blackie v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Stanley v. University of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Centeno-Bernuy v. PerryDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Exxon Corp. v. Esso Worker's Union, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Haynes v. MaldonadoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024