Legal Opinion
Exxon Corp. v. Esso Worker's Union, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 1, 1997No. C. A. 92-12594PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On September 16,1996, this court granted defendant Esso Worker’s Union’s (the “Union”) motion for summary judgment, upholding an arbitrator’s award requiring Exxon, among other things, to reinstate truck driver Albert Smith who had tested positive for cocaine while off duty. Exxon Corp. v. Esso Worker’s Union, Inc., 942 F.Supp. 703 (D.Mass.1996). Exxon has moved for entry of a stay of the judgment pending appeal. The Union opposes the motion. For the reasons stated below, Exxon’s motion is being allowed.
II. DISCUSSION
A. The Applicable…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Efrain Rivera-Vega v. Conagra, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Canterbury Liquors & Pantry v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Canterbury Liquors & Pantry v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Ortiz v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Nation v. TannerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015
- Carnevale v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.