Hart v. Paulus
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*354LINDE, J.
In a statutory proceeding specially prescribed by the legislature, petitioners challenge the validity of the process by which certain constitutional amendments were referred to the voters.
Much of the time and attention of the Legislative Assembly during 1983 was devoted to searching for means to limit or reduce local property taxes. The legislature did not enact such a program during its regular session. There was substantial disagreement over funding property tax reduction by means of a retail sales tax. The search was renewed in a special session called for that purpose, but…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oregon Medical Ass'n v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Oregon Medical Ass'n v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Heintz v. SINNER ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Priestley v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by11 opinions
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Lipscomb v. State Bd. of Higher Ed.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. SnyderOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Cyrus v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Blair v. CayetanoHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.