Legal Opinion

Priestley v. Paulus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1984No. SC S30205; SC S30206PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Attorney General provided a ballot title for a measure to be submitted to the people to amend the Oregon Constitution. Two petitions were filed under ORS 250.085, challenging the provided title as being insufficient and unfair. One petition was by State Senate President Edward N. Fadeley and the other by State Representative Wally Priestley. On our own motion we consolidated these two matters.

By ORS 250.035 a ballot title must consist of:

“(a) A caption of not more than 10 words by which the measure is commonly referred to;
“(b) A question of not more than 20 words which plainly states the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pacific Power & Light Co. v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hart v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hart v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API