Legal Opinion

McLennan v. Bank of California

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1891No. 12944PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

This action was brought by Donald Mc-Lennan, now deceased, and was tried, judgment entered, and notice of intention to move for a new trial served and filed during his lifetime.' After his death his administrator, the present plaintiff, was substituted, and a new trial refused.

From the order made in the premises the plaintiff appeals.

The action is to recover of the defendant, a banking corporation, the sum of ten thousand dollars and interest. It is alleged in the complaint that on the twenty-seventh day of November, 1869, the Mission and Pacific Woolen Mills, Consolidated, a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McQuillan v. DonahueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Baker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Broad v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Crook v. ForsythCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Mogk v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Pauly v. PaulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Toole v. WeirickMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. City of Los Angeles v. HannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Mattock v. GoughnourMontana Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API