Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Hannon
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1926No. Docket No. 5365PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
The plaintiff and respondent instituted this action in eminent domain on June 10, 1915, to condemn lands of the defendants for the purpose of opening and widening Long Beach Avenue, in the City of Los Angeles. Referees appointed by the superior court filed their report on June 18, 1918, awarding to the appellant the sum of $6,805.20 and $15 costs. To such report appellant filed exceptions, and a hearing before the court below was had on July 20, 1919, on which date the trial court ordered judgment in favor of Catherine Hannon in the sum of $9,640.70 for the land sought to be taken, $4,295.72…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Bensley v. Mountain Lake Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Prothero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Brady v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Heinlen v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Francis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- McDonald's Systems of California, Inc. v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.