Legal Opinion

King v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 1, 2002No. C2-01-2251PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice.

Appellant Scott Nolan King appeals from the denial of his second petition for postconviction relief, stemming from his conviction for first-degree murder while attempting to commit first-degree criminal sexual conduct for the 1992 killing of Gwendolyn Lewis. We affirmed his conviction on direct appeal, State v. King, 513 N.W.2d 245, 249 (Minn.1994) (King I), and affirmed the denial of his first petition for postconviction relief, King v. State, 562 N.W.2d 791, 797 (Minn.1997) (King II). In his second petition for postconviction relief appellant argues…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Hodgson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Andersen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Noske v. FriedbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State v. HeigesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API