Legal Opinion

Randall Mfg. v. Rea

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 30, 2013No. 2012-1611PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TARANTO, Circuit Judge.

FG Products owns U.S. Patent No. 7,214,017, which is directed to moveable bulkheads for partitioning cargo space in a shipping container. FG’s competitor, Randall Manufacturing, requested inter partes reexamination of the '017 patent, and the Patent and Trademark Office examiner rejected a number of FG’s claims as obvious over a combination of four pri- or-art references. On appeal, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (now the Patent Trial and Appeal Board) reversed, unable to discern any reason that one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Dystar Textilfarben Gmbh & Co Deutschland Kg v. C.H. Patrick, Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Perfect Web Technologies, Inc. v. InfoUSA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  2. Belden Inc. v. Berk-Tek LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  3. Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  4. Ariosa Diagnostics v. Verinata Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. HTC Corp. v. Cellular Communications Equipment, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API