Legal Opinion
HTC Corp. v. Cellular Communications Equipment, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 18, 2017No. 2016-1880PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
HTC Corporation and ZTE (USA), Inc. appeal a final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review. Appellants argue that the. Board improperly construed the claim term “message” and erred in finding that HTC failed to show that the prior art anticipated or rendered obvious the challenged claims. We find no error in the Board’s claim construction, and substantial evidence supports the Board’s patentability determination. We affirm.
Background
A. The ’174 Patent
U.S. Patent No. 7,941,174 (“ ’174 patent”) is directed to methods and apparatuses…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Game and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Wargaming Group LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Indivior Inc. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Praxair Distribution, Inc. v. Mallinckrodt Hosp. Prods. Ip Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.