Legal Opinion

Ames v. Ames

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided September 14, 1988No. 09-87-125 CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

In the trial court R.E. Ames and R.G. Ames were plaintiffs and the Heights State Bank, now known as the NBC Bank, Houston-N.A., was a defendant. The litigation involved the claims of R.E. Ames and R.G. Ames, who were participants in the Threaded Steel Products Company employees profit sharing plan, hereafter “the plan”. The litigation was also brought by the plaintiffs against Roger Michael “Mike” Ames, the trustee of the profit sharing plan, based on his failure to distribute sums of money owing to the plaintiffs under the plan, and for his wrongful conversion of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Dyson v. Olin Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Cropper v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ames v. AmesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Herschbach v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  3. Great North American Stationers, Inc. v. Ball, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  4. Ames v. AmesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ames v. Ames, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API