Legal Opinion

Ames v. Ames

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided September 14, 1988No. 09-87-125 CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

757 S.W.2d 468 (1988)

Roger Michael AMES, et al., Appellant,

v.

R.E. AMES and R.G. Ames, et al., Appellees.

No. 09-87-125 CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

August 25, 1988.

Rehearing Overruled September 14, 1988.

David D. Peden, Jr. and Read Koury, Richie & Greenberg, P.C., Houston, for appellant.

Arthur R. Almquist, Mehaffy, Weber, Keith & Gonsoulin, J. Hoke Peacock, Orgain, Bell & Tucker, Beaumont, for appellees.

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

In the trial court R.E. Ames and R.G. Ames were plaintiffs and the Heights State Bank, now known as the NBC Bank, Houston-N.A., was a defendant. The…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Dyson v. Olin Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Cropper v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API