Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 25, 1924No. 14128PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranson, J.

It is unnecessary to discuss the proceedings ancillary to the main questions, and which had for their purpose the’ maintenance of the status quo of the property pending this litigation. We go to the main questions.

The suit is in equity and is for the purpose of having a trust decreed in certain real and personal property in .favor of the plaintiff. Annabelle Edwards was the plaintiff in the district court. The relief sought was against Cora E. Edwards (Mrs. J. H. Edwards) and J. I-I. Edwards (husband of Cora E. Edwards) and Cora E. Edwards as executrix of the will of W. L. Edwards, deceased.…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Warburton v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Arnett v. ReadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Wright v. Hays' Adm'rTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Hayden v. DannenbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Hudgens v. State Ex Rel. Mills, Co. AttorneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ludey v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Catron v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Chase Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  4. Lewis v. SchaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Ward v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API