McNamara v. Steckman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
This is an appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action to recover an alleged commission of $3,000 earned by him in the sale of certain real estate owned by defendant. The trial court found in substance that defendant, by written agreement of January 8, 1924, employed plaintiff, a duly licensed real estate broker, to sell his said property for $78,000, payable upon the terms stipulated in said agreement, plaintiff to receive for his services a commission of five per cent of the purchase price, and the agreement to continue until terminated by fifteen days’ notice to plaintiff; that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Davis v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Carrington v. SmithersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- St. Charles v. HackmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Wood & Tatum Co. v. BaslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Malmstedt v. StillwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Deeble v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Love v. GulyasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Kopf v. MilamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.