Wood & Tatum Co. v. Basler
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Z. B. West, Judge Presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was for the recovery of a broker’s commission for the sale of certain real property, and plaintiff had the judgment from which the appeal has been taken.
Plaintiff, being a real estate firm, entered into a written agreement with defendant on December 13, 1911, whereby the former secured an option for the purchase of certain real property, and the next day this was supplemented by another agreement signed by defendant, providing that “in consideration of the services to be rendered and the expense to be incurred by the Wood & Tatum Oo., in promoting the sale of the real property…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Healy v. Visalia & Tulare R.R.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Carrington v. SmithersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Taber v. Piedmont Heights Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bail v. GlantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Malmstedt v. StillwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Deeble v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- McNamara v. SteckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Freeman v. CreelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.