Legal Opinion

Haugen v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 18, 1978No. WCB 77-881, SAIF HD 106442, CA 11165PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Claimant, a Port of Portland (Port) police officer, suffered a back injury at home during non-working hours while exercising with weights. The issue on appeal is whether the claim was compensable. We hold that it was not and reverse the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board.

The evidence indicates that police officers for the Port perform functions that require that they be on their feet much of the time and that on occasion they may have to use physical force in effectuating an arrest or crowd control. The written job specifications require that officers "must be in good physical…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. University of Denver v. NemethSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  3. Winter v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Matter of Piusinski v. Transit Valley Country ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Olsen v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Compensation of Halfman v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Richmond v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Meeks v. Eddy County Sheriff's DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Davenport v. City & County of Honolulu, Honolulu Fire DepartmentHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API