Richmond v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
The issue in this workers’ compensation case is compensability. The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirmed the opinion and order of the referee, which denied the claim. We review de novo and affirm.
Claimant is a police officer employed by the City of Lebanon. He injured his knee while playing in a benefit basketball game between the Police and Fire Departments of the city. Knee surgery was required, which resulted in time loss.
The facts are not disputed. The basketball game took place at the Lebanon Union High School gymnasium for the benefit of the Wigwam Wisemen, an athletic booster…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Haugen v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roberts v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. DaltonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Rose v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Colvin v. Industrial IndemnityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Kim v. Mt. Hood Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.