Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 1979No. Civ. 53430PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FILES, P. J.—
I
Petitioner City of Los Angeles (City) asks a review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board .finding respondent Ray Noetzel’s injury to his back on September 27, 1976, was a compensable industrial injury.
Noetzel is employed by the City as a police officer. The injury which is the subject of this review occurred when Noetzel was at home and off duty, exercising with weightlifting equipment in preparation for a physical fitness test to be given by City’s police department.
The physical fitness test, to be conducted in October 1976, was for strength,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dimmig v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Haugen v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- DEPT. OF WATER AND POWER OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
3Cited by8 opinions
- Western Electric Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Wilson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Meeks v. Eddy County Sheriff's DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- City of Stockton v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- City of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.