Legal Opinion
Winter v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 23, 1954No. Civ. 8619PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
On petition we heretofore issued a writ to review an order of the Industrial Accident Commission denying compensation to petitioner for the loss of an eye.
Respondent commission found that petitioner’s injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment as a caddy by the Stockton Golf and Country Club.
There is no dispute as to the following facts: The Stockton Golf and Country Club maintains a golf course for the use of its members. Petitioner was working as a caddy, performing the usual duties of that employment. Petitioner worked during the 1952 summer vacation under a work…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Matter of Piusinski v. Transit Valley Country ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
3Cited by29 opinions
- Reinert v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Jewel Tea Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
- McCarty v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.